Cases 1 - 10 of 2,908
Williams v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center, J. Cinblon and Sgt. E. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02658
Plaintiff:
David Lewis
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hughes v. Washington County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lynn hughes
Defendant:
Washington County Sheriffs Department, Foister, Travis Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv11288
Plaintiff:
Kierstin Lewis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Seals v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Packers and Stockyards Division et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Gary Seals
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture Packers and Stockyards Division, Farm Credit Mid-America, PCA, Citizens Tri-County Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181 Packers & Stockyard Act
Karnes v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brandon Karnes
Defendant:
Paul Thomas, Christy Combs, Amber Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11232
Plaintiff:
Tonia E Lewis
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lewis v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65431
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Lewis
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
