Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Allen v. Blakeman et al
as 2:2026cv01622
Defendant:
S. Evans, M. Reger, Zachary Gould and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyle v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2026cv03482
Defendant:
FNU Barban, FNU Wright, FNU Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Kristopher M. Kyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tyler v. City of Brooklyn et al.
as 1:2026cv02649
Plaintiff:
Melissa Tyler
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn, Scott Mielke, Paul Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al.
as 3:2026cv02621
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Sims
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Investigator Terrance Brown, STG Officer Jason Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bennett v. Passion Care, LLC et al.
as 4:2026cv02567
Plaintiff:
Rhonda J. Bennett
Defendant:
Passion Care, LLC and Abe Glanz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bennett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02744
Plaintiff:
Joe Bennett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Martell Jones v. Charles Strickland, et al
as 26-1832
Plaintiff:
MARTELL DEVON JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES STRICKLAND, then Acting-Sergeant, official and individual capacity, MICHAEL ENDERLE, Correctional Officer, official and individual capacity, DALE BONN, Deputy Warden, official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
