Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE SMITH
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Zantout
as 0:2020cv00009
Petitioner:
Michael Dale Smith and Michael D. Smith
Respondent:
Mohamed Zantout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Nathan Giles, Dale Smith and Janet Smith
Plaintiff:
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arkels et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11308
Plaintiff:
Bradley Luckhart, Bobby Bolden, Mason Morris and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Smith v. Streeval
as 0:2019cv00022
Respondent:
J. C. Streeval
Petitioner:
Michael Dale Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01070
Plaintiff:
Richard Dale Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Thompson v. Cuyahoga County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Calvin Thompson
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Sheriffs Department, Alfred Wilcox, Cuyahoga County Prosecutors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02581
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bird et al v. Ingham County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2014cv00633
Plaintiff:
Norman Bird and Raymond Bird
Defendant:
Ingham County Sheriff Department, Livingston County Sheriffs Department, David Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Nicky Dale Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
