Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel M. Smith, Dinah Smith, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Smith et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02357
Plaintiff:
Daniel Peter Smith and Linda Joy Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. City of Reynoldsburg et al
as 2:2019cv03554
Defendant:
Officer Sean McGrew, City of Reynoldsburg, Sergeant Kevin M. McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Smith, Robert Lawhun and Daniel L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Evans et al v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
Buddy Evans, Richard Cardwell and Daniel A. Smith
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Keith Helton, Eddie Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton et al v. Smith et al (JRG2)
as 3:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Barton and Kenneth D Biles
Defendant:
Daniel J Smith , Donald M Patton and Relyant Global LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Cooney et al
as 2:2016cv00344
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Smith
Defendant:
Charles Cooney, Sullivan County Jail and Wayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cooney et al
as 2:2016mc00009
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Smith
Defendant:
Charles Cooney, Sullivan County Jail and Wayne Anderson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13853
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bank of America, N.A. v. Relyant, LLC, et al (TV2)
as 3:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Relyant, LLC, Daniel J Smith and Donald M Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
