Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Massey et al
as 3:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
David Walker and Tammy Walker
Defendant:
George Nelson Massey doing business as Comet Express and Bryant K. Crutchfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Federated Mutual Insurance Company v. A-1 Certified Service, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
A-1 Certified Service, Inc. and David Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Walker v. Henry Ford Health System, et al
as 19-2494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE DAVID WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN RAND, Sheriff, HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Walker v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2019cv12343
Defendant:
Original Tear Group, Steven Rand, Ashley J. Friess and others
Plaintiff:
Joe David Walker
David Walker v. Arvil Chapman, et al
as 19-5687
Defendant / Appellee:
C. BERNARD, Officer in Charge, LIEUTENANT NEADHAM, JOY TROUDER, ECF Classification Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WALKER
Walker v. Chapman et al
as 1:2018cv01252
Defendant:
f/n/u Walton, f/n/u Neadham, A. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
David Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Chapman et al
as 3:2018cv01363
Defendant:
C. Barnard, Arvin Chapman, f/n/u Walton and others
Plaintiff:
David Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Erdos
as 1:2018cv00903
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos
Plaintiff:
Dr David Walker
Petitioner:
David Walker
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
