Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Garner et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
Mark Garner and Karen Hill
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garner PadgettIn re: Garner Padgett
as 24-5273
Petitioner:
In re: GARNER DWIGHT PADGETT
Respondent:
BRIAN ELLER, Warden
Padgett v. Slatery
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Garner Dwight Padgett
Defendant:
Herbert Harrison Slatery, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garner v. Claud et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ryan Garner
Defendant:
Jailer Ken Claud, Lt. Donald Underwood and Nurse Leesia Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kalamazoo Public Safety Department et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Public Safety Department, Sydney Garner, Mitchell Vorick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Garner v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Eric Antonio Garner
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Charles Rettig, US Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leroy Garner v. Fuyao Glass America, Inc.
as 23-3960
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
FUYAO GLASS AMERICA, INC.
Garner v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
as 1:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
Deborah Garner
Defendant:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation doing business as Cleveland Clinic
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ruff v. Jackson Township, et al.
as 2:2023cv02916
Plaintiff:
Mark Ruff, Ruff Land Holdings LLC and Ruff Agri-Services LLC
Defendant:
Jackson Township, Jackson Township Board of Zoning Appeals and Marion Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
