Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Joy v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ingham County et al
as 1:2023cv01326
Plaintiff:
Randy Joy and Rambo El
Defendant:
30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ingham County, Randy Craig Grose, Marquis Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Anthony Grose, Sr. v. City of Bartlett, TN Government, et al
as 23-5937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY T. GROSE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BARTLETT, TN GOVERNMENT, Keith McDonald, Mayor - Bartlett Police Department (BPD), NICK BRAMLETT, In his BPD official and individual capacity, WESLEY WILSON, In his BPD official and individual capacity and others
Smith v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
H. Joyner, D. Altizer, Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02754
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2020cv00060
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Hunley, J. Price and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grose v. City of Bartlett, Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2020cv02307
Defendant:
Nick Bramlett, City of Bartlett, Tennessee Government, Wesley Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Grose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ziegler v. Clay County Sheriff et al
as 2:2019cv11105
Defendant:
Fran King, M. P. Morris, Clay County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ziegler
Jack et al v. South Park Ventures, LLC et al
as 2:2018mc00033
Plaintiff:
John Jack and Terry Clark
Defendant:
South Park Ventures, LLC and Dean Grose
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Grose-Dowdy v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2016cv02589
Plaintiff:
Lonita Grose-Dowdy
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Jim Strickland, City of Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
