Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Harris v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Betty Noble, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Ramey et al
as 0:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rodger E. Williams and Willow Williams
Defendant:
Betsy Ramey, Ferguson, President of WellPath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNichols v. Armark Corp. et al
as 0:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Armark Corp., Theresa Gullett and Adam Bare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson et al v. AM Construction Inc.
as 2:2022cv02815
Plaintiff:
Jeff Patterson, Hunter Thomas, Tyler Gann and others
Defendant:
AM Construction Inc. and AM Construction Inc. d/b/a AMCON Industrial, a Georgia Corporation,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wanda Tubbs v. Jeff Long, et al
as 22-5127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WANDA TUBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF LONG, in his capacity as the Tennessee Commissioner of Safety, STATE OF TENNESSEE, BRANDON GULLETT and others
Harper v. Leverette et al
as 4:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Levon Harper
Defendant:
Joshua Leverette, Brandon Gullett, Robert Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Major Galloway, Joshua Gullett, Linnea Mahlman and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denny Gullet v. J. Streeval
as 19-5191
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNY R. GULLET and DENNY GULLETT
Respondent / Appellee:
J. C. STREEVAL, Warden and JASON C. STREEVAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
