Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Hix v. Dayton Childrens Medical Center
as 3:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Ella Mae Hix
Defendant:
Dayton Children's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hix v. Dayton Childrens Medical Center
as 1:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Ella Mae Hix
Defendant:
Dayton Children's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Oakland County et al
as 2:2022cv11187
Plaintiff:
Glorianna Moore
Defendant:
Oakland County, Brian Wilson, Eric Hix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hix et al v. Wyndham et al (TV1)
as 3:2019cv00490
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Ownernship, Inc., Destinations, Inc. Wyndham, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Hix and Harry Hix
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Hix et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02441
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Hix and Debra Hix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vecchio et al v. Taylor et al
as 3:2017cv01502
Plaintiff:
Sol David Vecchio, Josh D. Kukuk, Tyler C. Lane and others
Defendant:
Patricia Taylor, Ben Hall McFarlin, Jr., Barry R. Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hix v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 3:2015cv00492
Plaintiff:
Stephanie R. Hix
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Roberts v. Wethington et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roberts and Carol Roberts
Defendant:
Wethington, James Wethington, Robert S. Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Hix v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Hix
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hix v. Evergreen Professional Recoveries,Inc.
as 1:2010cv00580
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hix
Defendant:
Evergreen Professional Recoveries,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
