Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, Legal Administrator, GARY MINIARD, Warden and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 23-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, Legal Administrator, GARY MINIARD, Warden and others
Danny Jones v. Jerry Spangler, et al
as 23-5331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY J. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY SPANGLER, Mental Health Director, JIM CASEY, Regional Director M/H, CHRISTOPHER ENGLISH HUGAN, Conservatorship and others
Jones v. Montgomery County Jail
as 3:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Jones
Respondent:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes et al v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2022cv02865
Not Classified By Court:
T. J. Jones
Plaintiff:
Eloise Stover Hayes and David Hayes
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., Kroger Limited Partnership I and Kroger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Spangler et al
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Jones
Defendant:
Jerry Spangler, Jim Casey and Christopher Hugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rife v. Jones
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rife
Defendant:
J Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Root #242126 v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Root #242126
Defendant:
J. Jones, M. Stephens, Unknown Rurka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Jones
as 4:2021cv01971
Plaintiff:
Rico Hairston
Defendant:
J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
