Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00919
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ely v. City of Akron, Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ely
Defendant:
warren Spragg, Thomas J. Phillips and City of Akron, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02216
Plaintiff:
Leigh J. Phillips
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01101
Petitioner:
Brian J. Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Grant v. Fultz et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
United States and Lovie D. Grant
Defendant:
Joyce Fultz, J. Phillip Jones, J. Phillip Jones Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Phillips et al
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Thunder Young
Defendant:
J Phillips and Sullivan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00415
Plaintiff:
Dixie J. Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillips-Addis #420015 v. Bush et al
as 1:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Phillips-Addis #420015
Defendant:
N. Monroe, Jeremy Bush, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Phillips-AddisIn re: Andrew Phillips-Addis
as 20-1728
Respondent:
LES PARISH, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: ANDREW J. PHILLIPS-ADDIS
Phillips-Addis #420015 v. MacEachern et al
as 1:2020cv00710
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Phillips-Addis #420015
Defendant:
Unknown Best, Unknown Ward, Ken MacEachern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
