Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Shaw v. Dermatology Realm et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dermatology Realm, Clarx Big Country Dermatology, Memphis Dermatology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norman et al v. R. Edward et al
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Norman, Rooks Chazsity and Retic Jessica
Defendant:
R. Edward, J. William and Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. R.G.P., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv10354
Plaintiff:
Amy Myers
Defendant:
R.G.P., Inc. Doing business as Quality Team 1 and Bradley J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Lisa J. Williams
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 4010 Expedited Funds Availability: Violation of Act (Civil Liability)
McDaniel v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv02806
Plaintiff:
Markeith McDaniel
Defendant:
James Williams, Terrance Moore and Anita J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams
as 2:2023cv02984
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams
as 2:2023oe02984
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Aetna Better Health of Ohio
as 2:2023cv02985
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Williams
Defendant:
Aetna Better Health of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grice #254091 v. Hairston et al
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff:
Arthur Grice #254091
Defendant:
Unknown Hairston, Jonathan Bowman, Kendra Warman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peacock et al v. MPS Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Larry Peacock and Tennessee Valley Painters Health Fund
Defendant:
MPS Group, Inc. and Charlie J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
