Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Barker v. Muskingum County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv04987
Plaintiff:
Dustin Edwin Barker, DeAngelo Dewon Tellis, Jamie Lee Mayle and others
Defendant:
Muskingum County Jail, Muskingum County Sheriff's Office, Muskingum County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Roberts et al
as 3:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Richard B. Roberts, Jamie Lee Roberts, Commonwealth of Kentucky Division of Unemployment Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Barnhill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv14440
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Barnhill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
USA v. Becknell et al
as 6:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Jeneen M. Becknell, Unknown Spouse of Jeneen M. Becknell and Jamie Lee Young Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Peterson v. Heymes, et al.
as 1:2015cv00969
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Peterson
Defendant:
David Heymes, Greg Somers, Mark Uribe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Naughton v. SSA
as 1:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Naughton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Naegele v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 1:2013cv00528
Petitioner:
Jamie Lee Naegele
Respondent:
Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keegan v. Food Concepts International, LP et al
as 2:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Keegan
Defendant:
Food Concepts International, LP , Abuelo's International LP , Mark Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
USA v. Jamie Channer
as 11-2263
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMIE LEE CHANNER
Reynolds v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2011cv00093
Petitioner:
Jamie Lee Reynolds
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
