Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee: HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Otworth v. Rogers et al
as 1:2020cv01047
Defendant: Thomas L. Dorwin, Eric Earl Murphy, Paul Lewis Maloney and others
Plaintiff: Clarence Otworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 14-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee: HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, BERNARD FREIDMAN, PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Newell #248931 v. Clay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00184
Plaintiff: Alfonzo Newell #248931
Defendant: Eric L. Clay, John M. Rogers and Peter Economus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Tarnow et al
as 2:2013cv12604
Plaintiff: Antonio Hudson
Defendant: Arthur J Tarnow, Bernard Freidman, Paul Komives and others
Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00798
Plaintiff: John A Rogers
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
John Sandles v. Chastang, et al
as 12-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee: RITA C. CHASTANG, SARAH RESNICK COHEN, GEORGE C. STEEH and others
John Sandles v. Clay, et al
as 12-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC L. CLAY, JOHN M. ROGERS, JAMES L. GRAHAM and others
Sandles v. Chastang et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv11721
Plaintiff: John Eric Sandles
Defendant: Rita Chastang , Sarah Cohen , George Steeh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02339
Plaintiff: John P. Rogers
Defendant: NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?