Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ardis v. Jinhal et al
as 2:2018cv13537
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster Ardis
Defendant:
Jinhal and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis v. Polavarapu
as 2:2018cv13264
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster Ardis
Defendant:
Ravindra Polavarapu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis #191278 v. Unknown Parties #1 et al
as 2:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Unknown Parties #2, Unknown Parties #1, Unknown Jinhal and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster Ardis #191278
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis #191278 v. Polavarapu
as 2:2018cv00152
Defendant:
Ravindra Polavarapu
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster Ardis #191278
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2017cv13267
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
The Outlaw Motorcycle Club Inc et al v. Knox County, TN et al
as 3:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
The Outlaw Motorcycle Club Inc , Mark Lester , Kenneth Foster and others
Defendant:
Knox County, TN, City of Knoxville, TN, Jimmy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Foster v. Sharee Booker
as 08-1626
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH FOSTER
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAREE BOOKER, in his/her official capacity as member of the Michigan Parole Board, et al.
Kenneth Foster, et al v. Sharee Booker
as 08-1478
Plaintiff:
KENNETH FOSTER, et al.
Appellant:
KENNETH M. WOJNICZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAREE BOOKER, in his/her official capacity as member of the Michigan Parole Board, et al.
Kenneth Foster, et al v. John Rubitschun, et al
as 08-1372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAREE BOOKER, in his/her official capacity as member of the Michigan Parole Board, et al.
Kenneth Foster, et al v. Sharee Booker, et al
as 08-1371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH FOSTER
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAREE BOOKER, in his/her official capacity as member of the Michigan Parole Board, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.