Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Melton v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65681
Plaintiff:
William Melton
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
McClain Durst
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ashbrook v Meigs County, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hannah Ashbrook
Defendant:
Meigs County, TN, State of Tennessee, Attorney Casey Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyle Heyward v. Veronica Dinkins, et al
as 24-3036
Plaintiff:
LYLE M. HEYWARD
Defendant:
VERONICA DINKINS, KASEY PLANK, R. BAUER and others
Joshua Garton v. W. Crouch, et al
as 23-6002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA GARTON
Defendant / Appellee:
W. RAY CROUCH, DAVID RAUSCH, BRADLEY NEALON and others
Melton et al v. Minnesota Life Insurance et al
as 6:2023cv00174
Executor:
Crystal Melton
Defendant:
Minnesota Life Insurance and Jamey Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Murphy v. Drinkard et al
as 2:2023cv12390
Plaintiff:
Autina Murphy
Defendant:
James Drinkard, Jason Melton and Stanley Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zelesnik v. Melton et al
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Steve Melton, Judge Zalla, Congress Woman Joyce Beatty and others
Melton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01733
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Jordan Melton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Apogee Coal Company, et al v. OWCP, et al
as 23-3297
Petitioner:
APOGEE COAL COMPANY and ARCH RESOURCES, INC.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RUTLAND MELTON and BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
