Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Moss v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65050
Plaintiff:
Mr William D Moss
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior PLC, Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05223
Plaintiff:
Mr William A Anderson and Amber B. Anderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royalty v. Chandler et al
as 5:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Captain Mrs. Tabott, Brandi Renee Ritchie, Judge Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett Eugene Royalty, II and Garratt Eugene Royalty, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watison v. Sarratt et al
as 1:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Mr. Williams, Mrs. Reeves, Mrs. Ashley Ackerman and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond King Belal Watison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watison v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2019cv02684
Plaintiff:
Raymond Watison and Raymond King Belal Watison
Defendant:
Herbert H. Slatery, III, Mr. Williams, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connell v. Davol, Inc.
as 2:2019cv03814
Defendant:
Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mr. william o'connell and William O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rimmel v. Burke (JRG2)
as 1:2019cv00223
Defendant:
Bobbie J Burke
Plaintiff:
Mr. William Allen Rimmel, III and William Allen Rimmel, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sejour v. Nielsen et al
as 1:2019cv00260
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Michael Klinger, Mr. Kirstjen M. Nielsen and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Williams Sejour
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Keeton v. Williams
as 4:2019cv00656
Petitioner:
Michael A. Keeton
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
