Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Muir v. Beal et al
as 2:2024cv10898
Plaintiff:
Jeff Muir
Defendant:
Stewart Beal and Beal Properties LLC
Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv10511
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jordan Timco
Defendant:
Police Department Sterling Heights, Phillip Descamps, Mario Bastianelli, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jordan Timco
Defendant:
Sterling Heights Police Department, Phillip Descamps, Mario Bastianelli, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Havela et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mason, Anita Demyers Hatchel, Guy Havela and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Innovative Production Systems LLC v. Hoskin & Muir, Inc.
as 2:2021cv11613
Plaintiff:
Innovative Production Systems LLC
Defendant:
Hoskin & Muir, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00355
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Foster v. Muir et al
as 1:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
Christopher Foster
Defendant:
ABC World News and David Muir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Edgar Muir v. Marion County Government et al
as 1:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Marion County Government, 12th Judicial Drug & Violent Crime Task Force, Charlie Rittenberry and others
Plaintiff:
William Edgar Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kemisha Muir v. Jordan Danner, et al
as 20-5937
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEMISHA MICHELLE-ANN MUIR
Defendant / Appellant:
JORDAN DANNER, in his individual capacity and CHRIS MACE, in his individual capacity
Muir v. USA
as 1:2020cv00159
Petitioner:
Edgar Muir
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
