Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Madrigal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Richard Madrigal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Madrigal v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10311
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Madrigal v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv04979
Plaintiff:
Fernando Madrigal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Madrigal et al
as 3:2019cv11028
Defendant:
Marcos Madrigal, Michael Bacile and Michael Hillock
Plaintiff:
Mr. Brendan Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Madrigal, et al
as 3:2016cv02176
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Linda V. Madrigal, Rita Madrigal Ramirez and Eggleston Meinert & Pavley Funeral Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Madrigal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv02314
Plaintiff:
Christina Madrigal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Madrigal-Gutierrez v. USA
as 2:2013cv00186
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raul Madrigal-Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Madrigal-Negrette v. Lappin et al
as 4:2012cv14012
Petitioner:
Jose Madrigal-Negrette
Respondent:
Harley G Lappin and Federal Detention Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
