Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Padgett v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 1:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Jason Gabbard, Commonwealth of Kentucky and Fred A. Stine
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Padgett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padgett v. Rekow & Stull Orthodontists
as 1:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Rekow & Stull Orthodontists
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Padgett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05604
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00625
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Riggs, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lee et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20076
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee and Linda J. Lee
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lance Pough v. David Lee, et al
as 08-4254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE POUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LEE and MARK LEE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crossland v. Rowe et al
as 5:2008cv00091
Petitioner:
Mark Lee Crossland
Respondent:
Marsha Rowe, James Gilliam and Denise Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. State of Tennessee Department of Human Resources et al
as 3:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lynn Reyes
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Department of Human Resources, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Russ Dedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reyes et al v. State of Tennessee Department of Human Resources et al
as 3:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lynn Reyes
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Department of Human Resources, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Russ Dedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
