Cases 1 - 10 of 52
McKinnon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02545
Plaintiff:
Ralph McKinnon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinnon et al v. Kalkaska County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Stuart McKinnon and Michael Cox
Defendant:
Kalkaska County Board of Commissioners, Kalkaska Memorial Health Center, kalkaska County Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
International Watchman, Inc. v. Reeds Wilmington Jewelers, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
International Watchman, Inc.
Defendant:
Reeds Wilmington Jewelers, Inc., Big Idea Design, LLC, M. LaHart & Company, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA v. Molly McKinnon
as 23-5773
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MOLLY IRENE MCKINNON
McKinnon v. Foley
as 4:2021cv01878
Petitioner:
Scott A. McKinnon
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Struckel v. Macomb County et al
as 2:2020cv12995
Defendant:
Andrew McKinnon, Spitz Pathology Group, PLLC, Daniel Spitz and others
Plaintiff:
Robinette Struckel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Yale Law School et al
as 4:2020cv01770
Respondent:
Thomas Ferdinand, Peger Blanck, Desireo Corone Ferdinand and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
