Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Nunn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Bennie Nunn
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nunn v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv04271
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Nunn
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tocarchick v. Fouts et al
as 2:2022cv12545
Plaintiff:
Susan Tocarchick
Defendant:
Jim Fouts, Holly Nunn, Christran Benoit and others
Sims v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Montoyya Sims
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Petition for Removal - Tort Claims Procedure
Andrew Fields, III v. Patrick Bouldin, et al
as 22-5133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK J. BOULDIN, FRANK W. HEFT, JR., ROBERT BRUCE BONAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Jones v. Sanders et al
as 3:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
Javeona Jones
Defendant:
Aaron Sanders and Barr-Nunn Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Asher et al v. Clay County Board of Education et al
as 6:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Clay County Board of Education, CCBOE, Mark Hoskins and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Asher, Shawn Smith, Carol Jean Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Fields v. Bouldin et al
as 3:2020cv00705
Defendant:
Bottoms, Patrick J. Bouldin, Frank W. Heft, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunn v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05381
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ANITA NUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
