Cases 1 - 10 of 6,970
Woodall v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02698
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Lt Jones, Lt Varnes and others
Plaintiff:
Tacy Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horner v. County Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Defendant:
City of Morristown, Bradley Gilmer, Hamblen County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
William Horner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Vital & FNR Northa America, LLC
as 3:2024cv01612
Plaintiff:
Raybin I. Jones
Defendant:
Vital & FNR Northa America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Erby v. State of TN et al
as 2:2024cv02675
Defendant:
R. Hubbard, Captain Andrews, Captain Cato and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lyles v. Papendick et al
as 2:2024cv12436
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Keith Papendick, Sharon A. Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lyles
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Blankenship v. Bill Jones Trucking LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00251
Defendant:
Jacob C. Pilgrim and Bill Jones Trucking LLC
Plaintiff:
James Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jones v. Douglas
as 4:2024cv12422
Petitioner:
Dexter Carl Jones
Respondent:
Adam Douglas
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jones
as 5:2024cv01560
Defendant:
Charles E. Jones
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Scott v. Jones
as 2:2024cv12382
Defendant:
Thomas Jones Doing business as Gridiron Bar and Grill
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harrison et al v. Norwood et al
as 2:2024cv12386
Plaintiff:
Bt3 Viral Marketing, Jerren Harrison Holdings LLC, I Am Hip Hop TV Distribution and others
Defendant:
The Tronix Network Inc, RayJ Touring Inc, !st Round Knockout Publishing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
