Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Williams v. Wright-Patt Credit Union
as 3:2019cv00233
Defendant:
Wright-Patt Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Travis Lanier Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Qualls v. Wright-Patt Credit Union, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01965
Plaintiff:
Natalie Qualls
Defendant:
Wright-Patt Credit Union, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
myCUmortgage, LLC v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Wilford L Davis, Wright Patt Credit Union, Inc, Montgomery County Treasurer and others
Plaintiff:
myCUmortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00844
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Petras v. Wright-Patt Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2017cv01999
Plaintiff:
Laura Petras
Defendant:
Wright-Patt Federal Credit Union , Cenlar, FSB , MyCuMortgage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duke v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Duke
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Rutherford County Sheriff Dept., Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv00164
Plaintiff:
Tasha Robinson
Defendant:
The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company , Wright Patt Credit Union and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patts #223295 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00411
Plaintiff:
Arnold M. Patts #223295
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, Cheryl Groves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
