Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Farmer v. Bellott et al
as 2:2020cv02156
Respondent:
Centurion Medical, William Bryan Lee, Lawrence A. Bellott, III and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Bellott et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Defendant:
William Bryan Lee, Centurion Medical, Tony Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Hopkins County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
Richard Edward Moore, III
Defendant:
Hopkins County, Kentucky , Joe Blue , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Mark Dietz & Co. et al
as 3:2016cv02064
Plaintiff:
Owen Bell
Defendant:
Mark Dietz & Co. , William Bryan Farney & Co. , Cole Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. Dietz et al
as 3:2016cv01560
Plaintiff:
Owen Bell
Defendant:
Mark Dietz and William Bryan Farney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington et al v. Smokey Mountain Getaways at Town Square, LLC (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington , Margaret Washington , William Bryan and others
Defendant:
Smokey Mountain Getaways at Town Square, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Smokey Mountain Getaways at Town Square, LLC
Counter_defendant:
William Bryan , Regina Days-Bryan , Margaret Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Polston #794019 v. Stoddard
as 1:2014cv00289
Petitioner:
William Bryan Polston #794019
Respondent:
Cathleen Stoddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Bagwell
as 3:2011mc00014
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
William Bryan Bagwell
William Cottingham v. Policy Studies, Inc.
as 08-5488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM BRYAN COTTINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
POLICY STUDIES, INC.
Cottingham v. Policy Studies, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00580
Plaintiff:
William Bryan Cottingham
Defendant:
Policy Studies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
