Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Witmer v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE L. WITMER
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boileau et al v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00139
Defendant:
Sarah O'Connell, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Thomas Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Tangredi Boileau and Kyle Joseph Boileau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emery v. Kory et al
as 2:2019cv11419
Defendant:
Allen Kory, City of Lansing, State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Emery
In Re Invacare Derivative Litigation
as 1:2012cv00259
Defendant:
Dan T. Moore, III, C. Martin Harris, Dale C. LaPorte and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth Witmer, et al v. Acument Global Technologies, I, et al
as 11-1793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH WITMER, JOSEPH OLEX, RALPH W. WILLIAMSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ACUMENT GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PLATINUM EQUITY, a Delaware corporation and TEXTRON, INC., a Delaware corporation
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Veda Dove, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Donald "Rick" Bonnee, Jr., Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witmer, et al v. Acument Global Technologies, Inc, et al
as 2:2008cv12795
Defendant:
Acument Global Technologies, Inc, Platinum Equity, LLC and Textron, Inc
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Witmer, Joseph Olex, Ralph W Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv10166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
