Cases 1 - 10 of 191
Mach v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mach
Defendant:
Hon. Merrick Garland, Hon. Christopher Wray, Hon. Steven Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2024cv02378
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Donald Wray Rodgers and Three Bridges Trading Fund, LLC
Ashour v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Ashour
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, New Orleans Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kuntz et al v. Wray
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rachel Kuntz
Defendant:
Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargo v. Graves et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Derrick Vargo
Defendant:
Matthew Graves and Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
