Cases 71 - 80 of 831,391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Herrera-Plazas v. Garland
as 24-1646
Petitioner:
CLARIBEL HERRERA-PLAZAS, NEYMAR PARRA-HERRERA and KEVIN PARRA-HERRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kaur, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3852
Petitioner:
RAMANJIT KAUR, ANGREJ SINGH, PARNEET KAUR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3858
Petitioner:
DAYA SINGH, KIRATPAL KAUR KAUR and RANJEET SINGH SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gaitan v. Bank of America N.A.
as 3:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Timothy Gaitan
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Gaither v. Williams. et al.
as 3:2024cv01089
Petitioner:
Burrell A. Gaither
Respondent:
- Williams, A. George, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ion v. COUNTY OF BUTLER et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Plaintiff:
Kristoffer Ion
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUTLER, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, PRISON BOARD OF BUTLER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
West Bend Mutual Insurance, Company v. Wood Tree Service, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
West Bend Mutual Insurance, Company
Defendant:
Wood Tree Service, LLC doing business as Robyn Wood Tree Service and Robyn Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Great Midwest Insurance Company v. Auxilium Health Network, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv05304
Defendant:
Fung Wah Chris Ruiz, Auxilium Health Network, Inc., Healthcare Crossing Medical Corporation, dba Tri-Valley Internal Medicine Group and others
Plaintiff:
Great Midwest Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
