Cases 11 - 20 of 351
Harris v. Jewell
as 2:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
Steven Lamar Harris
Respondent:
Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SHANNON v. SHAFFER et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Defendant:
SHAFFER, REGAL, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
JACOB C. BRIER
Defendant:
AKILAH LAMAR, JACKSON, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meakens v. Walsh et al
as 1:2023cv17164
Plaintiff:
Lamar M Meakens
Defendant:
Ann Celine O'Hallare Walsh, Lee J. Roupas and Candice Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snelling v. St Joseph County Jail
as 3:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
Terrence Snelling and Terrance Lamar Snelling, Jr
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khonsu El v. Indiana State of et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Selah Khonsu El and Lamar James Wilson, Sr
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Allen County of, Fort Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar Whatley v. Steven Campbell
as 23-3104
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR EDWARD WHATLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
TYRONE BAKER, Warden and STEVEN CAMPBELL
Nicholas LaCruze v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 23-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS LACRUZE
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP, JONATHAN JACKSON and others
PARKER v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2023cv01874
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY LAMAR PARKER
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, SHERIFF, DUZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
