Cases 11 - 20 of 103
AFFOLDER v. MEDICAL
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
ABBIE AFFOLDER
Defendant:
MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Affolder v. Medical
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Abbie Affolder
Defendant:
Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner, Michael v. Taylor County et al
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Ledell Turner
Defendant:
Taylor County, Sheriff Larry Woebbeking, Chief Deputy Corey Dassow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Jennifer et al
as 3:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Byron E. Adams
Defendant:
Jennifer and Abby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROTE v. MARION COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv02350
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY GROTE
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL, DOCTOR UNKNOWN, JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2022cv01369
Plaintiff:
Micah Glenn and Micah Ernest Glenn
Defendant:
John T Chisholm, Kaitlyn Lewis, Katherine Seelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LENOIR v. JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv02204
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE LENOIR
Defendant:
JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL, QUALITY 360 HEALTHCARE, NURSE PRACTICTIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENOIR v. JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE LENOIR
Defendant:
JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL, QUALITY 360 MEDICAL, MELINDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gmeiner et al v. Wienke
as 2:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Abby Gmeiner and Tanya Dear
Defendant:
Tina Wienke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDIN v. BURGHER et al
as 2:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
CHARLES J. HARDIN
Defendant:
ROBERT BURGHER, FRANK VANIHEL, BARBARA BROCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
