Cases 21 - 30 of 123
COVINGTON v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE OF INDIANA L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00134
Defendant:
D. BEDWELL, B. SMITH and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE OF INDIANA L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
TODD COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLES v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03204
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., JANE DOE, H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 2:2020cv01597
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Waukesha County Jail and Correctional Officer Hoskins
Plaintiff:
Richard Dell Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Winnebago County Sheriff et al
as 3:2020cv50352
Defendant:
Winnebago County State's Attorney, Rick Ciganek, Winnebago County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JESTER v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00461
Defendant:
LISA BOCK, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, DANIEL BEDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALTER v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
as 2:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
TRACEY LAMOUAR SALTER, II and GODLY DASYPUL
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMULLEN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2020cv00343
Defendant:
D. BEDWELL, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE OF INDIANA, LLC and B. SMITH
Plaintiff:
HENRY TYWAN MCMULLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamb v. County of Lake et al
as 1:2020cv03592
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., LT. Ted Uchieck, William Thornton and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 3:2019cv01153
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Taylor
Defendant:
Ellis and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERRANO v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 2:2019cv00510
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, D. BEDWELL, WALLACE and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN SERRANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
