Cases 31 - 40 of 2,345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LEWIS v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIYO LEWIS
Defendant:
BEDWELL, AIRMARK and FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pablos Cafe and Bar LLC v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2024cv01770
Plaintiff:
Pablos Cafe and Bar LLC
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, a municipal corporation, Tiffany A. Henyard, Lacey Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lewis Miller, Jr. and Lewis Miller, Jr
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Darwin Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Darwin Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Aujua S. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
