Cases 41 - 50 of 1,130
MCCAMMON v. GUTLING et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALLEN MCCAMMON
Defendant:
GUTLING, WOODS, TITUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Todd A. Dickson, II
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton, Debbie Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Dustin Havens, Sr. and Dustin J. Havens, Sr.
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton, Debbie Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPERT v. STATE
as 1:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
ASHLEY STAPERT
Respondent:
STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bertha v. Kane County et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
David A Bertha
Defendant:
Kane County, DeKalb County, Lake County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaFerriere v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Wayne LaFerriere
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Debbie Meier, Ashley Tinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Murray
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Ashley J Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hydron v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hydron
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Levi Smith and Ashley Smith
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Fouts v. Wabash County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Fouts and Jacob A Fouts
Defendant:
Wabash County Jail, Sheriff, Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
