Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Patterson v. Adams et al
as 1:2017cv01078
Plaintiff:
Wayne Patterson
Defendant:
Carol Adams, James Dimas, Michelle Saddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUIZ v. DOOLEY et al
as 4:2016cv00204
Defendant:
BROWN, B. DOOLEY, GILTNER and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN JOSUE RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holifield v. Rivamonte et al
as 2:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
Al Holifield
Defendant:
Jonathan Rivamonte, Members of Milwaukee Metro Drug Enforcement Group, West Allis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dooley v Dougherty et al
as 4:2016cv04086
Plaintiff:
Charles Dooley
Defendant:
Daniel Dougherty, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Dooley v. Jason Chenoweth, et al
as 16-1626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DOOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON CHENOWETH, Security Therapy Aid 1 and MICHAEL TEEL
PENICK v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2015cv00162
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, ROBERT DOOLEY and JAMEY NOEL
Plaintiff:
ANTOYNE MAURICE PENICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KURZ et al v. TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2015cv01440
Defendant:
PATRICIA CRAWFORD, DANIEL DOOLEY, MARK HESTER and others
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY KURZ, MEAGAN STOKER and CINDER WEBER
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Dooley v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07222
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Dooley
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Dooley v. Kevin Winters, et al
as 15-2703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DOOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN WINTERS, WANDA PENNOCK, AMY CLARK and others
FRALEY v. KELLOGE et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Defendant:
CAPEHART, DOOLEY, JORDAN KELLOGE and others
Plaintiff:
HARRISON TEDDY FRALEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
