Cases 41 - 50 of 152
Hoskins, Michael v. Mahoney et al
as 3:2019cv00480
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Adderton and Officer Mahoney
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Hoskins
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tay v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv00501
Defendant:
Lieutenant Campbell, Assistant Warden Walker, Officer Garret and others
Plaintiff:
Tay Tay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 2-50, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH WINKLE and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arquero v. Sheriff Tom Dart et al
as 1:2019cv01528
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Sheriff Tom Dart, Tom Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Arquero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stamps v. Erickson et al
as 2:2019cv02032
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Jane Doe, . Erickson and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lamar Stamps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Doe et al
as 2:2018cv02025
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and Milwaukee Sheriff
Plaintiff:
Lavell Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Podkulski v. Kaminsky et al
as 1:2018cv07872
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and Officer Kaminsky
Plaintiff:
Steven Podkulski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Self v. Bergh et al
as 2:2018cv01823
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Brown County Jail, Officer Pelischek and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of JEMEL ROBERSON v. Officer John Doe et al
as 1:2018cv07476
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and The Village of Midlothian
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Roberson, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of JEMEL ROBERSON and Beatrice Roberson
Respondent:
Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary v. City of Blue Island Police et al
as 1:2018cv07343
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, City of Blue Island Police, Sergeant Sisk and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
