Cases 61 - 70 of 2,175
Payton et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ernest Payton, Tommy Hill, Marcus Wright and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. Nealey Foods
as 1:2023cv17160
Plaintiff:
Nichole R Hill
Defendant:
Nealey Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Carrillo, Sr. et al v. Tommy's Redhots, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv17016
Plaintiff:
Cesar Carrillo, Sr. and Cesar Carrillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommy's Redhots, Inc., Thomas Greico, Donald Greico and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jamal Johnson v. Warden Williams, et al
as 23-3380
Plaintiff:
JAMAL JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAMS, Warden of Hill CC, OFFICER LITTLE and OFFICER MILLER
Mason v. Hill Correctional Center
as 4:2023cv04222
Plaintiff:
Mickey Mason
Defendant:
Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. I.M.P.D
as 1:2023cv02220
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
I.M.P.D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drews v. Eagan et al
as 2:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
Michael G A Drews and Michael G Drews
Defendant:
Sgt Eagan, CO Gomez, CO Beekman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. I.M.P.D
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
I.M.P.D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Comedica Incorporated v. Hill-Rom Services, Inc.
as 23-3314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMEDICA INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.
Hill v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03816
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Janice Hill
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
