Cases 81 - 90 of 483
TUNGATE et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06352
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ELAINE CURRY, BUFORD THOMAS TUNGATE and ANDREW TUNGATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURRIE v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Defendant:
HENSLEY, BUELTEL, NATHAN HASSLER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LORENZO CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01048
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Commissoner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Curry v. Gallegos
as 1:2021cv00617
Defendant:
Timothy Evans, Kimberly Foxx, Joseph Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Respondent:
Evans, Amanda Gallegos, Executive Director, Cook County Jail, Bitar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Cook County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2021cv00452
Defendant:
Queen, Beachum, Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRIE v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00021
Defendant:
HENSLEY, BUELTEL, NICK SAMMET and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L. CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BARBER et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN
Defendant:
VIRGINIA CAUDILL, NATHAN PARTON, JOHN JAY BOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Curry v. Cook County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2020cv07410
Petitioner:
Bobby Curry
Respondent:
Cook County Sheriff Office and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Saul
as 2:2020cv01814
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Frank Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
