Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzalez Colon v. Benjamin & Shapiro LTD et al
as 1:2023cv16560
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Gonzalez Colon
Defendant:
Benjamin & Shapiro LTD, Sandman, Levy & Petrich, LLC, Lyle Zuckerman & Davis Wright Tremaine LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GONZALEZ-TORRES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2021cv02935
Petitioner:
ANGEL GONZALEZ-TORRES
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howe v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv05685
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Howe
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Michael Coli, Ralph Menezes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
States Self-Insurers Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. City Of Waukegan
as 1:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
States Self-Insurers Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Waukegan, IL , Adrene Yancey, Luis Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gonzalez v. City of Waukegan et al
as 1:2016cv02906
Plaintiff:
Angel Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Waukegan, Adrene Yancey, Luis Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00961
Plaintiff:
Angeles Gonzalez
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Angel Gonzalez v. Dr. Adrian Feinerman, et al
as 11-1804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. FEINERMAN, M. FAHIM and DONALD GAETZ, Warden
Gonzalez v. Feinerman et al
as 3:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Angel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Dr Feinerman, M Fahim and Donald Gaetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
