Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Burnside et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Brian Armond Burnside, Nicole Renee Burnside and NAB
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Katherine Susan Gorman, Mark Edwin Gilles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The People of the State of Illinois v. Burnside
as 1:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of Illinois
Defendant:
Brian Armond Burnside
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Capesius et al v. City of Evanston, Illinois
as 1:2022cv01754
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Capesius, Richard T Clucas, Jr., Joseph Des Jardins and others
Defendant:
City of Evanston, Illinois and City Of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Woods v. Walmart
as 2:2019cv00172
Defendant:
Walmart
Plaintiff:
Martez Armond Woods
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Puerner v. Fofahn et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Eric Barber, Kathy Sable, Danielle Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Lester Armond Puerner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staten v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2019cv01054
Plaintiff:
Armond Staten
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STATEN v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2019cv00358
Plaintiff:
ARMOND STATEN
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dial v. Levy, et al
as 3:2018cv01263
Plaintiff:
Paulette Dial
Defendant:
Armond Levy , St. Louis Neurosurgery, L.L.C. and Christian Hospital Northeast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
