Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ty'Shawn Gilmore v. Brian Anderson, et al
as 22-2989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TY'SHAWN K. GILMORE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN ANDERSON, JONATHAN BARRY, JOHN DOE 1 and others
ANDERSON v. SKELTON
as 4:2021cv00034
Defendant:
PEGGY SKELTON and PEGGY Anderson
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Anderson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01099
Plaintiff:
Brian Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ashford et al v. Pennock et al
as 4:2019cv04215
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Paula Lodge, IL Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford and Brian Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashford et al v. Pennock et al
as 4:2018cv04202
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Paula Lodge, Wanda Pennock and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford and Brian Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv08366
Plaintiff:
Brian Anderson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Brian Anderson v. James Ward #12533 et al
as 1:2013cv09056
Plaintiff:
Brian Anderson
Defendant:
James Ward , Louis Pinklyn and The City of Chicago
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Agans, et al v. Daniel Williams, et al
as 12-3719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY S. AGANS and KANDI S. TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL J. WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity, PATRICK KISLER, in his individual capacity, CHRIS HOWARD, in his individual and official capacities and others
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Anderson et al
as 1:2012cv03165
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Brian Anderson, Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
