Cases 1 - 10 of 1,180
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HOLDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and T.J. WATSON
Respondent:
STEVEN KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HOLDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STEVEN KALLIS, WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heon Lee v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 19-2786
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, MEGAN CUNNIFF CHURCH, PATRICK M. OTLEWSKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEON SEOK LEE
Lee v. Clinton et al
as 1:2018cv08294
Defendant:
Richard A. Pelletier, Rajnath Laud, Duc H. Nguyen and others
Plaintiff:
Heon Seok Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Thelen v. James Cross, Jr., et al
as 16-1207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK THELEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES CROSS, JR., Warden, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Patrick Thelen v. James Cross, Jr., et al
as 15-3665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK THELEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES CROSS, JR., Warden, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00494
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
