Cases 1 - 10 of 2,219
Michalski v. Purillo et al
as 1:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Cortez Michalski
Defendant:
Purillo, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mains, Donald v. Conley, William et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Mains
Defendant:
Judge William Conley, Martin D. O'Malley, Social Security Workers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Massey v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Massey
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Sarah Jones, James W Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mike's Auto Body of Glenwood City, LLC et al v. St. Croix County et al
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Mike's Auto Body of Glenwood City, LLC and Michael Barstad
Defendant:
St. Croix County and Scott Knudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Titus Henderson v. Mike Donovan, et al
as 24-1759
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
MIKE DONOVAN, DAVID BROOKS, JODIE PERTTU and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Joseph Delarosa v. Village of Romeoville, et al
as 24-1715
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DELAROSA
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE, BRANT HROMADKA and MIKE RYAN
Winkler v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Sonya Winkler
Defendant:
David John Harris, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JONES v. MAJESTIC CARE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
TEDDIE B JONES and TEDDIE JONES
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE CENTER, MAJESTIC NURSING HOME, DAVID EARLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
