Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Robbins v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Mr. Steven L Robbins and Steven L Robbins
Defendant:
Mr. Ron Neal, Mr. Dylan Cabanaw, Mr. THOMAS FRAZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mark, Jonathon v. Winkleski et al
as 3:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Mark
Defendant:
Mr. Winkleski, Mr. Cahak, Lt. Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Overlog, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Mr. Thomas Smith and Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Overlog, Inc., Mr. Ilic Denis and Denis Ilic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Jess et al
as 1:2021cv01479
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Peter Huibregtse, Timothy Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Earls-Rozelle v. Chorle et al
as 1:2021cv06793
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Laretta Earls-Rozelle and Laretta Earls-Rozelle
Defendant:
Mr. Erhard R. Chorle, Mr. John Bragg, Mr. Thomas R. Jayne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Mark, Jonathon v. Winkleski et al
as 3:2021cv00650
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Mark
Defendant:
Mr. Winkleski, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Cahak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Fernandez v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2020cv50093
Defendant:
Al Doyle, Zahtz(Phonetic), Newman and others
Cross Defendant:
Unknown John Does
Plaintiff:
George Albert Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wu v. Kallies et al
as 1:2019cv08388
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas Kallies, Southern Cross Resources Group, Inc., Jeffrey Pozen and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alan Wu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Boyd v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv07080
Plaintiff:
Delmar Boyd
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas, Mr. Ross, Mr. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
