Cases 121 - 130 of 75,023
Bell v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04162
Respondent:
State of South Dakota and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Lemuel R. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Redix, Ellis, Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeks v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 6:2024cv06118
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Jerrilynn Hosman, Warden Jared Byers, Aundrea F Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell
as 4:2024cv04090
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Jason Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. John Doe Government Entity
as 5:2024cv05187
Defendant:
John Doe Government Entity
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Weis et al
as 6:2024cv02044
Petitioner:
Jessie James Jones, Jr
Respondent:
State of Iowa and Stephen Weis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hadley v. Iowa Department of Human Services
as 4:2024cv00309
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Human Services
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hadley, Jr.
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Olson et al
as 4:2024cv01206
Defendant:
Stephen P. Ranz, Jerrod D. Mahurin, Cira R. Duffe and others
Plaintiff:
Vance Roy Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Precynthe et al
as 4:2024cv01211
Defendant:
Unknown Conley, Anne Precynthe, Daniel Rector and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. USA
as 4:2024cv00595
Petitioner:
Joe Lee Nichols
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
