Cases 11 - 20 of 4,899
Soard v. Budnik et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Thomas Soard
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, Tasha Griffin, McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Kahl et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Investigator Logan Kahl, Unknown Officers, Chief David Zibolski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Hill v. United States
as 24-2023
Petitioner:
William Thomas Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Trent Allen Williams
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Roybal et al v. Schnell
as 0:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Lee Roybal, Native American Practitioners of their Religious Beliefs confined at M.C.F. Stillwater, the, Lance Lee Houle and others
Defendant:
Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
William Billy G. Carter
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
