Cases 41 - 50 of 74,287
Pratt v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts and Deputy Charlie Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00215
Petitioner:
Leonard Fisher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. O'Donnell
as 4:2024cv04123
Petitioner:
Breyon Wilbert Brown
Respondent:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Elkins et al
as 5:2024cv05134
Plaintiff:
James Lee Woods
Defendant:
Darrell Elkins and Debbie Burlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reller v. Pennington County, South Dakota
as 5:2024cv05047
Petitioner:
Dustin Reller
Respondent:
Pennington County, South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. Flecher et al
as 0:2024cv02585
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Belinger and Trisha Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Bennett et al
as 4:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Farris
Defendant:
Lt. Adam Bennett, Sgt. Julie Poirier, Sgt. Heather Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Best et al
as 1:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Public Defender Andrew Best and Richard Mitcham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Falkenrath
as 4:2024cv00897
Petitioner:
Michael Allan Black
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pratt v. Juneau et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Jerry Juneau, Sheriff Ricky Roberts and Charlie Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
