Cases 1 - 10 of 74,025
Wycoff v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wycoff
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jeff Barteff, Mike Heinricy and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dismuke v. Dunham et al
as 4:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Donald D Dismuke, Jr
Defendant:
James Dunham and Steven G Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Cortlen Waters
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins and Karen Whatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Reginald Deshone Johnson
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Nelson and Barry Hyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. McMiller et al
as 4:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Larry Edmond Williams
Defendant:
McMiller and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Saiamun
as 5:2024cv05039
Plaintiff:
Kelly Joe Campbell
Defendant:
Jason Saiamun, Eric Whitcher, Mrs. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abdikarim v. Jahner et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Jesse Jahner, Cass County, ND, Maggie Malon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whirlwind Horse v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04105
Petitioner:
Michael R. Whirlwind Horse, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Alex Reyes and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith v. Milstead et al
as 4:2024cv04104
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Keith
Defendant:
Sheriff Milstead, Deputy 1 and Deputy 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
