Cases 11 - 20 of 698
Galloway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Galloway, IV
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Ellis v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ellis
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Kimberly Adkins, Dale Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Paro v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Adam Paro
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Lampley v. Hopkins
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Lampley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Noel v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
Andrew Noel
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
King v. United State of America et al
as 8:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Nicholas E King and Nicholas E. King
Defendant:
United State of America and Connie Kallsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Patterson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Bryan J. Patterson, Mary Patterson and Bryan Patterson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, ICL Specialty Products Inc. and ICL Specialty Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Cherek v. BNSF Railway Company
as 8:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Michael Cherek
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
White v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee White
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Ashley Lepold, Dane R. Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Stuhr v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2023cv03246
Plaintiff:
Bryan M. Stuhr
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
