Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Schwarting v. Visan et al
as 5:2024cv05036
Plaintiff:
Avry Blue Schwarting
Defendant:
Officer Carmen Visan, Agent Bob Palmer, Agent B.J. George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Andrew Gibbons v. Ethan Bjorkland, et al
as 23-3348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew James Gibbons
Defendant / Appellee:
Ethan C. Bjorkland, Sgt. Property Dept. Moose Lake Prison--individual capacity, Melinda Erwin, Officer Property Dept. Moose Lake Prison--individual capacity, John Myers, Property Claim Coordinator Moose Lake Prison--individual capacity and others
Carl Long v. Jason Kander, et al
as 23-2706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Edward Long
Defendant / Appellee:
Jason Kander, Jordan R. Berges, Darryl Forte and others
Anthony Long v. Jean Baker, et al
as 23-2703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Edward Long
Defendant / Appellee:
Jean Peters Baker, Jordan R. Berges, Darryl Forte and others
Gibbons v. Bjorkland et al
as 0:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Gibbons
Defendant:
Ethan C. Bjorkland, Melinda Erwin, John Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Long v. Baker et al
as 4:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Long
Defendant:
Jean Peters Baker, Jordan R Berges, Darryl Forte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cobb v. Cobb
as 4:2021cv04064
Plaintiff:
Bobby Duane Cobb
Defendant:
Kim Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. Stenehjem et al
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem, Dick Gulmon, Jeffrey Erickson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loomis v. Johnson, et al
as 4:2020cv00866
Defendant:
Camille Johnson and Sheriff Garry Bush
Plaintiff:
Duane R Loomis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2020cv00862
Defendant:
Camille Johnson
Plaintiff:
Duane R Loomis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
