Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Poitra v. USA
as 3:2024cv00081
Petitioner: Adam Jason Poitra
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mainieri v. USA
as 4:2024cv00335
Petitioner: Adam Joseph Mainieri
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. USA
as 2:2024cv04003
Petitioner: Shunta Lamont Adams
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Leiva v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00083
Petitioner: Adam Scott Leiva
Respondent: United States of America
Interested Party: Mark C Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adam Branton v. United States
as 23-2350
Petitioner / Appellant: Adam Brent Branton
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Hurdsman v. USA
as 4:2023cv00315
Petitioner: Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv03015
Plaintiff: Frank Edward Adams
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Branton v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00290
Petitioner: Adam Brent Branton
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jefferson v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00189
Petitioner: Demetrius Elishakim Jefferson
Respondent: United States of America
Interested Party: Adam D Zenor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Linderman v. USA
as 0:2022cv01891
Petitioner: Daine Joseph Adam Linderman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?